In the previous shiur, we studied the third (and final..) answer of the gemara to the question of which case of olive oil consumption requires the beracha of borei peri ha-‘eitz. We also studied and discussed the difficulty the gemara raised with this case as well, and the answer given, which is a refinement and narrowing of the case ע”י אניגרון to a specific situation and use. We also studied the comments of Rashi on this material. At the end of the shiur we read the difficulty in Rashi’s explanation raised by Tosafot (the first comment of Tosafot at the top of Berachot 36a), in which the beraita quoted does not make sense. Please review this material and we will discuss any questions at the beginning of this shiur.
In this shiur, we will start with the abovementioned Tosafot and read his two alternative answers to his question. Then we will go back to the sugya and learn the final difficulty raised, and its resolution.